So it turns out, the other day, Congress failed to pass a bill that would allow Indian children to be put under educational contracts as apposed to being enrolled in a government funded public school. Those in favor of the bill made convincing arguments, pointing out that the current government funded public schools are not really providing an education, that the government does not have the funds nor the interest to make these schools more effective, and that the contracts would be almost entirely beneficial to those Indian children who want and need a proper education in both academics and Christianity. I do then wonder what the argument from the opposition was. My newspaper only provided sources form people in favor of the bill, congressmen from the states where the paper was published, and it therefore neglected to provide any information on the thoughts from those apposed to the bill.
The Intermountain Catholic
I like your character's openmindedness
ReplyDelete